Court says Ken Paxton's case against Austin and Travis County for issuing New Year's curfew is moot, dismisses case

1 min


130
18 shares, 130 points
Court says Ken Paxton's case against Austin and Travis County for issuing New Year's curfew is moot, dismisses case

Need to stay updated on coronavirus news in Texas? Our evening roundup will help you stay on top of the day’s latest updates. Sign up here.[1]

An Austin court on Thursday dismissed Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s appeal challenging Travis County and Austin’s New Years holiday curfew, months after it ended — in a perhaps symbolic win for local officials.

The 3rd Court of Appeals in Austin dismissed Paxton’s appeal on technical grounds. The case is moot, Justice Gisela Triana wrote in the court’s opinion[2], because the events already passed and Paxton’s appeal is contingent on future and uncertain events. The court’s lone Republican justice dissented[3].

Advertisements

While it’s been months since New Year’s, Paxton argued the case wasn’t moot and asked the court to prevent Austin and Travis — or other local authorities — from issuing similar orders in the future. The court refused.

The court’s decision comes months after Austin and Travis County’s order went into effect. Because a trial court refused to immediately end the restrictions as Paxton requested, the city and county were able to enforce the restrictions during the holiday — something local officials and health experts counted as a win. The Texas Supreme Court later blocked the curfew from continuing.

Paxton is currently suing Austin and Travis over officials continuing to require masks despite Gov. Greg Abbott ending the mask mandate statewide last month. A district judge refused to immediately end the order with the temporary injunction Paxton requested.[4]

The overall case is ongoing — and in the meantime, masks are still required in Travis County.

References

  1. ^ Sign up here. (www.texastribune.org)
  2. ^ wrote in the court’s opinion (search.txcourts.gov)
  3. ^ dissented (search.txcourts.gov)
  4. ^ refused to immediately end the order with the temporary injunction Paxton requested. (www.texastribune.org)

Reese Oxner


Like it? Share with your friends!

130
18 shares, 130 points

What's Your Reaction?

hate hate
0
hate
confused confused
0
confused
fail fail
0
fail
fun fun
0
fun
geeky geeky
0
geeky
love love
0
love
lol lol
0
lol
omg omg
0
omg
win win
0
win

0 Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.