Categories
Science

PM2.5 Emissions From Wildfires — No Longer So Exceptional! – Environment – United States


United States:

PM2.5 Emissions From Wildfires — No Longer So Exceptional!

To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Last week, the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee formally
transmitted its recommendations to EPA Administrator Regan
regarding the PM2.5 NAAQS.  Consistent with trade press
reporting over the past few months, the majority of CASAC members
recommended that the PM2.5 NAAQS be set between 8-10
ug/m3.  A minority recommended the range be set
between 10-11 ug/m3.  I’d be surprised if the
revised NAAQS is set above 10 ug/3. PICHUR

For me, what’s interesting about the letter is the
suggestion that:

EPA should consider the implications of the exceptional events
approach when applied to wildfires, particularly with respect to
the risk assessment.

Apparently, that language was toned from draft language that
more strongly suggested that EPA should change its exceptional
events policy.  Even so, it’s a pretty important
issue.  As the detailed CASAC comments note:

Exceptional events. EPA allows exclusion
of wildfire PM events under the exceptional event rule when
calculating PM2.5 design values. In some parts of the country
wildfires are no longer “exceptional”. The dramatic
increase in wildfires over the last decade is not natural; it is a
combination of anthropogenic climate change, forest management
practices, and power line ignition incidents. These are (in theory)
at least partially controllable. Given the potential for
significant adverse health events, it may be time to reconsider the
current approach to excluding the high PM exposures from wildfire
events in design values.

Should we really consider forest fires to be natural
events?  After all, Democrats think that the increase in
wildfires is tied to human-caused climate change.  Republicans
blame Democratic forest management.  Both explanations support
the conclusion that many wildfires are not natural events.

At CASAC’s suggestion, I’ve considered the implications
of the exceptional events approach and I think it’s time for a
change.

To view Foley Hoag’s Law and the Environment Blog
please click
here

The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.

POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Environment from United States

SEC To Take Up Climate Disclosures

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) scheduled a meeting for March 21, 2022, to vote on the long-awaited proposed climate change disclosure rules.

New State And Federal PFAS Regulation

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP

In 2021, new federal and California regulations were established to protect public health and environments from the impacts of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).



Source link

Google News

By Google News

GoogleNews is a news aggregator platform. It presents a continuous, customizable flow of articles organized from thousands of publishers and magazines.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.