Elon Musk snub: SpaceX CEO’s plan to colonise red planet is challenged by Mars expert

2 min

13 shares, 91 points
Elon Musk snub: SpaceX CEO’s plan to colonise red planet is challenged by Mars expert 1

In a talk at the International Astronautical Congress (IAC) on October 23, Mr Zubrin made the case for his long-standing “Mars Direct” plan. He pointed out that his plans made more sense than SpaceX’s current Starship architecture and the plans of NASA, which could use the Gateway lunar space station as a staging point for human Mars missions. Mr Zubrin said that there is a better way to make humanity a multi-planetary species than what has been tabled by both SpaceX and NASA.

Mr Zubrin argued that the propellant requirements of SpaceX’s Starship would be excessive for such a large vehicle.

He said: ”In short, this is the wrong way to use a Starship.

“Starship could be used as a fully reusable Earth to LEO [low Earth orbit] heavy-lift vehicle.”

He added that from orbit, payloads could stage off Starship to head to Mars.

Mr Zubrin proposed using another spacecraft, a sort of mini-Starship, to “stage off of Starship.”

A secondary vehicle for reaching Mars would be sized to be a fully reusable upper stage of SpaceX’s workhorse Falcon 9 rocket.

Mr Zubrin said this would reduce the fuel requirements sixfold.

He said: ”So, rather than being a 120-ton-to-orbit kind of vehicle, it’s a 20-ton-to-orbit vehicle,”

JUST IN: Elon Musk: Why has SpaceX CEO donated $ 1MILLION to plant trees?

Aboard this spacecraft would be a nuclear-powered rover that generates rocket fuel from the carbon-dioxide-dominated Martian atmosphere.

This rover’s work would ensure that the ERV’s fuel tank is topped up on the Red Planet.

Two more spacecraft would launch from Earth to Mars at the next available window, 26 months after the ERV takes flight.

The crew would then spend 18 months on Mars before returning to Earth.

Half a year later, they would arrive back on their home planet, and the next ERV and habitat combination would already be flying to the Red Planet, Mr Zubrin has suggested.

But this plan is not what SpaceX or NASA want to do, Mr Zubrin said in his talk.

Mr Zubrin has argued that the agency should reconsider this approach.

Mr Zubrin also brought up a few alternative architectures for the plan to land humans on Mars and have them set up a sustainable community there.

One he criticised was the idea of sending SpaceX’s Starship to the moon before going to Mars.

He said: ”Sending a Starship to the moon is like sending a carrier aircraft whitewater rafting.

“It’s the wrong spot for it,” Mr Zubrin said.

He said that one issue would be the amount of ejecta Starship would produce in the lunar environment, which could not only damage any lunar settlement nearby, but the Starship itself.

Like it? Share with your friends!

13 shares, 91 points

What's Your Reaction?

hate hate
confused confused
fail fail
fun fun
geeky geeky
love love
lol lol
omg omg
win win

Read exclusive latest news on entertainment, music, gaming and more topics with unprecedented coverage from around the UK and US.


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.