Tag Archives: nasty

Is Google’s ‘Deplorable’ New Expertise Secretly Monitoring Your iPhone?

Google’s industry mannequin used to be below attack but again this week, with a “massive coalition” of privateness oriented tech firms asking regulators to take a stand in opposition to “the series of recordsdata from across websites and products and companies,” enabling “dominant platform actors to abuse their positions by giving preference to their believe products and companies.”

Google wasn’t named, nonetheless then naming Google wasn’t in level of fact necessary. The campaign used to be organized by Chrome rival Vivaldi, which these days described Google’s secretive recent internet monitoring as a “nasty… unhealthy step that harms person privateness.”

This has been a worthy few months for Google as Apple has eroded its capacity to harvest recordsdata from its billion-plus iPhone customers, with “surveillance promoting” increasingly in the crosshairs. A intellectual mild is now vivid down on recordsdata harvesting, and it’s powerful harder for its leading protagonists to procure recent areas to veil.

As I’ve commented earlier than, whereas Apple Vs Facebook—Put collectively dinner Vs Zuck—came to personify 2021’s privateness battle, it’s in level of fact the philosophical standoff between Apple and Google that carries most significance. Lunge, Facebook placed on its laborious hat and took the early flak from Apple’s Privacy Labels and App Monitoring Transparency, nonetheless Google is nice as closely impacted, its iOS apps good as errant.

The irony that Apple’s crackdown has upped the price of Android customers to advertisers must aloof be lost on no-one. When I express iPhone, iPad and Mac customers to replace from Google apps to conceivable selections, it isn’t because Android customers are no longer equally—truly powerful extra—impacted by Google’s recordsdata harvesting, it’s that they must aloof take this with out any consideration, the place as a minimum Apple’s person can exercise enlightened more than a number of.

Help in March, when Google fired up its wide PR machine to push its “privateness-first internet” message, eyebrows had been quick raised. And then came FLoC—described as “creepy,” a “gruesome belief,” a “nasty” recordsdata harvesting enterprise. This quasi-nameless recordsdata harvesting landed so badly it has sent Google relief to the system strategy planning stage.

Certainly one of many most severe points with FLoC has been Google’s resolution to trial the technology on millions of staunch-existence customers, enabling it on their browsers with out allowing them to know, with out a warning, an make a selection-in or even instructions on how to make a selection out.

This has resulted in severe confusion spherical who would perhaps well impacted. These in Europe, the place GDPR protections apply, are no longer impacted but. But someplace else, whereas it’s obvious that customers of Chrome on PCs, Chromebooks and Android units are in chance, what about Apple’s extra locked-down ecosystem? Researchers have found fragments of FLoC common sense in Chrome iOS binaries; so, are you in chance from FLoC in your iPhone?

No longer good but you’re no longer. “Attributable to Apple’s requirement that every browsers on iOS exercise their WebKit rendering engine and JavaScript engine,” Google confirmed, at final, after I requested for clarification. “Chrome for iOS can’t exercise the Chromium engine. That methodology that it’s miles important extra work to port FLoC particularly for iOS.”

It’s no longer all appropriate recordsdata, despite the very fact that. Google rapid me that “FLoC is supported on Chrome for macOS.” And lots of iPhone customers have Macs, the place they’re extra possible to run Chrome.

For these on macOS or non-Apple units, Google has added controls to disable FLoC. “Under settings in Chrome,” it says, “you are going to be in a predicament to utilize to reveal off Privacy Sandbox trial parts, which includes FLoC… We’re working to give powerful extra controls and transparency in the waste as we incorporate suggestions.”

Privacy Sandbox Settings

Google Chrome / macOS

Google’s justification for FLoC, and for enrolling millions of Chrome customers in its recent trial with out be aware, is that their real recordsdata doesn’t leave their browser, it’s miles ragged completely to attach them to a cohort of likeminded customers. But as the privateness lobby has warned, once a cohort ID is linked to other identifiers, much like an IP cope with, that anonymity is compromised. And given the FLoC trial runs in parallel with these devilish third-celebration monitoring cookies, that threat is for the time being amplified.

FLoC used to be the first innovation to emerge from Google’s “Privacy Sandbox,” which it says will “provide the correct privateness protections for every person… By ensuring that the ecosystem can provide a take to their companies with out monitoring folks across the procure, we is also particular that that free to find admission to to swear continues.”

A “sandbox” is a receive surroundings that stops recordsdata or code leaking out or breaking in. The topic with the Privacy Sandbox, is that it’s Google’s sandbox, which we are being rapid will offer protection to our recordsdata from, erm, Google. “The Privacy Sandbox,” Brave warns, “is designed to attend advertisers as powerful as conceivable, with the hope that customers will tolerate it, or no longer peep. This is antithetical to how privateness instrument must aloof be designed, and incompatible with a person-focused internet.”

Google now says this is in a position to cease the FLoC trial over the arriving weeks. “We must take time to evaluate the recent technologies, to find suggestions and iterate to be particular that they meet our goals for every privateness and performance.” Help to that system strategy planning stage. The incorrect recordsdata for iPhone customers is that we don’t know what’s next—your free circulate would perhaps fair be short-lived.

“Google’s assertion would no longer commerce any piece of how FLoC works,” Vivaldi CEO Jon Von Tetzchner rapid me by electronic mail. “Browsers must aloof no longer profile customers… We take into consideration to any extent further or less surveillance-essentially based monitoring and promoting is incorrect.”

Ironically, Google has made the same pronouncements. “Folks shouldn’t must accept being tracked across the procure in swear to to find the benefits of relevant promoting,” it talked about in March, promising to banish monitoring cookies early next year. At the time, it used to be planning its FLoC more than a number of to meet the wants of advertisers. But now the self-discipline is even worse, the 2-year lengthen to its anti-cookie thought has undermined its guarantees.

“Chrome is the correct significant browser that would no longer offer significant protection in opposition to inferior-situation monitoring,” Mozilla warned this week, “and we are concerned that this lengthen in phasing out third-celebration cookies will continue to traipse away their customers unprotected.”

The timing would perhaps well no longer in level of fact be worse for Google, coming good as Apple’s latest innovation gifts as a correct away attack on Chrome’s industry mannequin.

iCloud+ Non-public Relay


iCloud’s recent Non-public Relay delivers a genuinely “privateness first internet” to Safari. The spoil up-stage architecture prevents somebody in the connectivity chain gathering every IP cope with and DNS queries to “resolve person voice… fingerprinting person identification and recognizing customers across completely different websites.”

“It’s severe to indicate,” Apple says, “that no-one on this chain—no longer even Apple—can explore every the client IP cope with and what the person is gaining access to. The alternatives for fingerprinting were eradicated.” Imagine Google announcing (and that methodology) the the same. As I have talked about, you are going to be in a predicament to clearly explore the completely different philosophies at play.

Authorized now, your iPhone is FLoC-free, nonetheless there’s no guarantee this is in a position to dwell that scheme—and whereas you run a Mac, it is top to aloof disable the Privacy Sandbox setting. Google needs to procure a trend to soothe and feed advertisers, whereas deflecting the flak from recent recordsdata harvesting revelations. That would perhaps very properly be an very unlikely puzzle to unravel.

The industry does seem ready to grab in genuinely privateness conserving initiatives that attain no longer shut the door on focused promoting. But we haven’t seen these as but. Absent a severe rethink, the likes of Safari and Brave and DuckDuckGo and Firefox will merely block all monitoring, with Chrome and smaller standouts left remoted.

“Though we perceive that promoting is a actually significant source of income for swear creators and publishers,” this massive coalition letter to regulators says, “this would no longer interpret the wide commercial surveillance programs situation as much as demonstrate the express ad to the express folks.” It’s changing into painfully worthy for Google to argue the level.

Read Extra

Android warning: DON’T download another app until know about these nasty new threats

Android warning: DON'T download another app until know about these nasty new threats

Android users are constantly being warned of fresh threats to their devices but 2021 could be the worst year yet. A new report from security experts at McAfee has revealed the scale of the problem with the firm saying that “2021 is shaping up to be a year of malware misinformation and sneak attacks.” These new threats range from annoying adware that fill devices with endless pop-ups to more serious banking malware which has the ability to steal personal financial data and access accounts.

Google has been hard at work making its Play Store far more robust, but it seems hackers are now using new techniques to infiltrate devices. One of the most popular ways of accessing smartphones is by getting Android users to install apps via text messages or posts on social media.

Unlike Apple’s iPhone, Android is a much more open platform which means applications can be installed from sources outside of the Play Store. This makes it a prime target for hackers intent on stealing data.

So, if you own an Android phone here are four of the biggest threats to watch out for this year.


Banking Malware has boomed in recent months with McAfee Mobile Security detecting a 141 percent increase between Q3 and Q4 2020.

Most Banking Trojans are distributed via mechanisms such as phishing SMS messages to avoid Google’s screening process. These malicious apps appear as some type of security scanner, with names such as OutProtect, PrivacyTitan, GreatVault, SecureShield, and DefenseScreen

Once activated they pretend to scan the phone for issues but they are simply looking for apps related to the targeted financial institutions such as online banking. If one is found, the malware notifies the user that a popular app, such as Google Chrome, WhatsApp, or a fake PDF reader, is out of date and urging an immediate update.

Clicking the “Update Now” button downloads additional malicious code and asks the user to enable accessibility services, which gives the app broad control of the user’s device.


Scammers will stop at nothing in a bid to access devices and have even sunk as low as to use the COVID pandemic for financial gain.

With most of the world still anxious about COVID-19 and getting vaccinated, cybercriminals are targeting these fears with bogus apps, text messages, and social media invitations.

McAfee says malware and malicious links hidden inside these fakes display ads and try to steal banking information and credentials.

One of the earliest coronavirus vaccine fraud campaigns was recorded in India in November 2020, before any vaccines had been approved in the country. This operation started with SMS and WhatsApp messages that encouraged users to download an app to apply for the vaccine. However, it was simply a trick to gain personal data.


Another nasty threat called Etinu has the ability to steal incoming SMS messages using a Notification Listener function. Where this malware is clever is that it can read a message without triggering the SMS read permission or read receipts.

As a result, the app can process information in the messages without alerting the user that messages have been read.

It can use these capabilities to make purchases and sign up for premium services and subscriptions that get charged to the user’s account.

Speaking about its latest threat report McAfee said: “To avoid security screening, many malware authors try to distribute their apps via SMS messages or links on popular social media sites.

“Others are writing apps with minimal but legitimate functionality, inserting malicious code during an update when scrutiny is lessened, and then downloading additional encrypted packages to obfuscate the real malware.

“Last year, cybercriminals expanded the methods they used to hide attacks and frauds, making them more difficult to identify and remove.

“Before downloading something to your device, do some quick research about the source and developer. Many of these have been flagged by other users.”

“Many malicious apps get the access they need by asking the user to grant them permission to use unrelated privileges and settings. When installing a new app, take a few moments to read these requests and deny any that seem unnecessary, especially for accessibility services and message notification access.”

Author: David Snelling
Read more here >>> Daily Express :: Tech

Your smart TV might be hiding a nasty danger that could put your home at risk

Your smart TV might be hiding a nasty danger that could put your home at risk

However, this figure surged to 12,807 scans or hacking attempts in the busiest week.

While there were 2,435 attempts to maliciously log into devices.

Which? worked with cyber security experts the NCC Group and the Global Cyber Alliance to carry out the study.

Thankfully, security protections that came with the devices managed to block most of these attempts.

The areas that the threats came from were America, Russia, India, China and the Netherlands.

The most common threat was trying to find unsecured devices and then using weak default passwords to access it.

Author: Dion Dassanayake
Read more here >>> Daily Express :: Tech

‘America has a very nasty oligarch problem’ – RT’s Keiser Report

‘America has a very nasty oligarch problem’ – RT’s Keiser Report

Max Keiser and Stacy Herbert talk about the Covid pandemic and all other problems crippling the US economy. There’s currently “one crisis on top of another, multiple crises all stacked up,” Max points out.

“The problem with the billionaires is that they got to be billionaires by hollowing out the economy, by destroying the infrastructure, by stealing from pension accounts, from destroying the moral fabric of the country,” he says.

“People like Warren Buffett, or Jeff Bezos, or Bill Gates, etc., achieved their wealth at the expense of the common good. They literally threw the country under the bus, and now we’re dealing with the consequences,” Max explains, adding that “America has a very nasty oligarch problem, and we need a leader that could deal with the oligarchs.”

For more stories on economy & finance visit RT’s business section

Author: RT
This post originally appeared on RT Business News

Nasty Google Chrome scam targets Android users – DON'T click on this update

Nasty Google Chrome scam targets Android users - DON'T click on this update

“The cybercriminal behind this campaign is trying hard to stay under the radar of mobile security solutions,” said Pradeo’s Roxane Suau.

“First, they use the victims’ phone numbers to expedite phishing SMS, to make sure they are not blocked by messaging apps’ spam filter.

“Secondly, the malware uses obfuscation techniques and calls external code to hide its malicious behaviors, hence eluding most threat detection systems.

“Thirdly, as soon as the app is identified and referenced by most antivirus, the cybercriminal simply repackages it with a new signature to go back under the radar.”

This post originally appeared on Daily Express :: Tech Feed

'What a nasty person you are' Britons fury as Lily Allen posts 'Oh, Philip has died'

'What a nasty person you are' Britons fury as Lily Allen posts 'Oh, Philip has died'

Throughout the day, Britons paid tribute to the Duke on social media and recalled fond memories and encounters with His Royal Highness.

Piers Morgan said he was a “truly great Briton” who dedicated his life to “selfless public duty”.

This Morning presenter Phillip Schofield wrote online: “Farewell to a remarkable man, terrifying to attempt to interview but great fun to be with.”

Meanwhile, Rod Stewart’s wife Penny Lancaster added: “Thoughts are with the Royal family, especially the Queen at the very sad news of the passing of Duke of Edinburgh, her husband of 73 years.”

Dyson’s all-new gadget will KILL the flu and other nasty dangers hiding in your home

Dyson’s all-new gadget will KILL the flu and other nasty dangers hiding in your home
Having recently revealed its new laser-guided vacuum cleaner, Dyson is back with another clever innovation that could make your home a whole lot safer to live in. The firm’s new air purifier is not only capable of busting the dust and nose-running allergens from your living space but it can even track down and kill bugs including the H1N1 virus. That sounds impressive, but there’s another reason why you might fancy installing one of these Dyson devices in your home.
The firm says that this latest gadget will constantly monitor levels of pollutants in the room and then set about destroying them. One of the most worrying dangers that lurk in our homes is a chemical called formaldehyde.

This colourless gas, which can cause asthma-like respiratory problems and skin irritation, is sometimes released by furniture and wooden products containing formaldehyde-based resins such as plywood and fibreboard. It’s also found in insulating materials and do-it-yourself products such as paint, wallpapers, varnishes and even household cleaning products.

These harmful particles are very hard to capture as they are incredibly small but Dyson thinks it has come up with a way of making sure you don’t breathe them into your lungs.

The firm’s Selective Catalytic Oxidisation (SCO) filter continuously destroys formaldehyde at a molecular level and it’s been made to ensure precise sensing of the pollutant for the lifetime of the machine.

READ MORE: Hellish new WhatsApp attack is stealing credit card details from your friends and family

Its design uses billions of atom-sized tunnels which trap and destroy formaldehyde, breaking it down into tiny amounts of water and CO2 . It then regenerates from oxygen in the air to keep destroying it continuously without ever requiring replacement.

You can also constantly check the levels of pollution, temperature and humidity via an app on your phone and Dyson says its latest purifiers have been made to be much quieter than before.

Considering we all breathe up to 9,000 litres of air and spend as much as 90 percent of our time indoors having a clean environment could be of serious benefit to our health.

Speaking about the new device, Alex Knox, Vice President of Environmental Care at Dyson said: “The off-gassing tendency of formaldehyde means that it can go undetected in a home for years. Dyson has engineered a machine that provides accurate and successful sensing, capture and destruction of the pollutant.

“Our solid-state sensor doesn’t dry out overtime, lasting the lifetime of the machine. The COVID-19 pandemic has raised global awareness about the air that we breathe and Dyson’s commitment to providing cleaner air through innovation and technology remains at the forefront of our mission.”

The new purifier with formaldehyde sensing will go on sale soon in White/Gold and cost £599.